Cake and Ice Cream…Hold the flour
February 28, 2009 at 1:08 am | In Cakes, Candy, Daring Bakers, Dessert, Ice Cream/Sorbets | 112 CommentsTags: Cake, Chef Wan, Chocolate, cream cheese, Daring Bakers, Flourless Chocolate Cake, Ice Cream/Sorbets, Lime, Peppercorn, raspberries, strawberries, Valentino Cake, white chocolate
Yes, it’s that time of the month again – the Daring Bakers Challenge! Yesss, it’s another challenge where the difficulty factor wasn’t high, once again making it easy for me to participate without having to set knee in the kitchen, or for my helpers to have to set foot in the kitchen more than a few times. The main component of this month’s challenge contains only 3 ingredients, yep, just THREE ingredients – chocolate, butter and eggs. The second component (which I’m ABSOLUTELY sure isn’t second to most people) is something I could cook, but it wasn’t absolutely necessary. Well, I guess the title kind of gave it away, but hey, I need some kind of intro, right? ;]
First off, I must add this paragraph so the DB-BOT will sense my participation and put me on it’s good baker list. It knows if I’ve been bad or good so I’ll be good for goodness…oh, wait, I’m confusing ‘it‘ with someone else. Here goes…
The February 2009 challenge is hosted by Wendy of WMPE’s blog and Dharm of Dad ~ Baker & Chef. We have chosen a Chocolate Valentino cake by Chef Wan; a Vanilla Ice Cream recipe from Dharm and a Vanilla Ice Cream recipe from Wendy as the challenge. Thank you for a great challenge, Dharm and Wendy! (That’s me thanking them – NOT part of THE paragraph).
OK, *wiping sweat off brow and chug-a-lugging Gatorade*, done! Seriously though, I think it’s a great idea, and it’s so helpful to Lisa and Ivonne in keeping up with who’s still in it, and who isn’t, not to mention those who have ‘cut class’ without a note, more than several times!
Truth be told, I’m not a fan of dark (bittersweet) or even semisweet chocolate, I can tolerate semisweet, but I don’t know what it is, other than being born without a dark chocolate gene. Regardless, I still bake with both quite a bit because people like it, they really like it! For this challenge I decided to keep the dark chocolate to a minimum. I baked two flourless (Valentino) cakes, the first being a white chocolate-dark chocolate layered dealypoo (translation – I split the master batter in two, 8 oz of each chocolate, and just dropped alternating spoonfuls of white chocolate and dark chocolate batter into the pan), for Valentine’s Day, and last week as yet another thank you gift to some of my helpers who came for dinner, a milk and dark chocolate Valentino, not layered or split, just melted together with the butter.
White chocolate really isn’t suited for a flourless chocolate cake because well, it isn’t chocolate and it’s cocoa butter content is very high. However, not being one to give up before actually testing something (unless it resembles a grenade or has a skull and bones on it), I went ahead with it. Guess what? It worked. You just need to work that confection like a cheap ho..ok, I’ll keep it G-rated – like a reindeer with a deadline (WHY is my brain dial set at Christmas today??)
Here’s the main caveat when you use white chocolate – the chocolate separates and curdles when you incorporate the egg yolks. Don’t be alarmed and give up, just keep mixing it and it’ll eventually come back together. The second caveat is that as it comes back together, it starts to firm up. NO worries, because once you fold in the egg whites, it loosens up again. The last caveat is that the white chocolate batter is much looser than the batter using real chocolate. I originally wanted to do a zebra drop layering, but the dark chocolate batter didn’t spread nearly as much as the white chocolate batter, so I ended up (as I mentioned above) just alternating heaping tabelespoons of batter on top of one another in a rustic (aka sloppy) manner. I kind of left it up to the baking gods after that.
The end result was most of the the dark chocolate batter sinking to the bottom while most of the white chocolate batter rose to the top. It was perfectly fine though, as it still resulted in a pretty presentation and most importantly, tasted great! Surprisngly, it set up really well. I was initially apprehensive due to a few daring DB’ers encountering runny interiors when cutting into their white chocolate Valentino’s after it seemed set. No idea why it worked for me, but here’s what I did in my attempt to tame that cantankerous confection for this preparation…
- I used Callebaut white chocolate (actually, it was all I had on hand)
- Mixed the heck out of the white chocolate-butter amalgamation after adding the egg yolks.
- Lightened the batter with a little more than a third of the egg whites, then folded in the rest
- Baked it for 30-32 minutes instead of the 25 stated in the recipe, and after letting it set at room temperature, refrigerated it overnight.
That’s it, and it was perfect – perfect enough to stick with a Valentine’s Day motif by cutting hearts out of the cake. I got a total of four 3-inch whimsical hearts from the 8-inch round cake, and the scraps were up for grabs!
The next part of this challenge was to make an ice cream to go along with the cake. We were given two great vanilla ice cream recipes by Wendy and Dharm, one a precooked custard, the other a no cook mixture, prior to freezing. However, we were given free reign to use any ice cream recipe or come up with one of our own. Naturally I chose a no cook recipe as simplicity is exponentially key for me now, and not sure my electric fondue pot would have held all the ingredients for the cooked version, lol!
The recipe I chose was one I’ve been using for years from my old standby site, Epicurious.com – a simple cream cheese ice cream that’s uber creamy and so incredibly smooth on the palate. I felt the light tanginess of the cream cheese would pair well with the extremely rich, dense cake. I put my own take on it by adding chopped strawberries, a touch of lime, and a small amount of VERY finely cracked pink peppercorn for a surprise bite of peppery heat. I also decreased the sugar since I felt it didn’t need as much as the recipe listed. Unfortunately, my ice cream bowls had been placed in a part of the freezer near the door where they never freeze up enough since the door is opened quite a bit. I didn’t realize this until I heard that liquidy sound during the churning. I removed the bowl and took some photos of the liquid ice cream anyway, not thinking I would use any of them, but one of the photos came out kind of cool, so I did (see above, next to the frozen heart by itself). After taking the photos, I poured the ice cream into a container and stuck it in the fridge so I could freeze it the next day, after the bowl was properly frozen in the RIGHT part of the freezer! Thankfully, everything turned out well, and the ice cream froze just fine the next day.
I packed some of the ice cream into heart shaped molds for the final freeze (not that it mattered, since my frozen hearts started to melt into a puddle of goo the minute I started taking pictures), since I was going for Valentine kitsch. OK, kitsch is an understatement! Everything about my presentation was less than original, everything epitomizing Valentine’s Day – from the chocolate dipped strawberries to the heart shaped cakes and ice cream to the chocolate straws and strawberry-raspberry coulis. Red, pink, chocolate, hearts GALORE!! It doesn’t get anymore Valentine than that! However, I was a little more creative with the dark chocolate-milk chocolate cake, but you’ll have to stay tuned for that one, since I plan on blogging about it next time!
Speaking of presentation, I topped each heart with chocolate ganache, then placed it on a grid of 4 chocolate straws. I placed the ice cream heart on it’s side and gave it a drizzle of strawberry-raspberry coulis (HA! A bleeding heart – I should have called the plate ‘MY HEART BLEEDS FOR YOUUU!), with a few extra dots outside the chocolate grid. A white and dark chocolate dipped strawberry was the final touch. Original or not, it reeked of love and was enjoyed immensely. In the end, that’s all that mattered.
Chocolate Valentino
For a real Valentino, bake it in a heart shaped pan or cut it out into a heart shape. You may use any shape pan that gives you an area of 50” – 6×8 or 7×7. An 8” spring form pan works with great results as do smaller pans or ramekins. An instant read thermometer highly recommended. Also, this cake will (obviously) taste exactly like the chocolate you use, so use a good quality chocolate.
Preparation Time: 20 minutes -
Ingredients
- 16 ounces (1 pound) (454 grams) of semisweet chocolate, roughly chopped
- ½ cup (1 stick) plus 2 tablespoons (146 grams total) of unsalted butter
- 5 large eggs separated
Directions
1. Put chocolate and butter in a heatproof bowl and set over a pan of simmering water (the bottom of the bowl should not touch the water) and melt, stirring often.
2. While your chocolate butter mixture is cooling. Butter your pan and line with a parchment circle then butter the parchment.
3. Separate the egg yolks from the egg whites and put into two medium/large bowls.
4. Whip the egg whites in a medium/large grease free bowl until stiff peaks are formed (do not over-whip or the cake will be dry).
5. With the same beater beat the egg yolks together.
6. Add the egg yolks to the cooled chocolate.
7. Fold in 1/3 of the egg whites into the chocolate mixture and follow with remaining 2/3rds. Fold until no white remains without deflating the batter.
8. Pour batter into prepared pan, the batter should fill the pan 3/4 of the way full, and bake at 375F/190C
9. Bake for 25 minutes* until an instant read thermometer reads 140F/60C.
Note – If you do not have an instant read thermometer, the top of the cake will look similar to a brownie and a cake tester will appear wet.
10. Cool cake on a rack for 10 minutes then unmold.
Strawberry Lime Cream Cheese Ice Cream with Pink Peppercorn
Makes about 1 quart
Ingredients
- 8 oz cream cheese, softened
- 1 cup milk
- 1 tablespoon fresh lime juice
- 1/2 teaspoon grated lime zest
- 1/2 cup sugar
- 1/8 teaspoon salt
- 1/2 cup heavy cream
- 1 cup chopped strawberries
- 1 tablespoon very finely cracked pink peppercorns (optional)
Directions
1. Blend cream cheese, milk, lime juice, sugar, and salt in a blender until smooth. Transfer to a bowl, then stir in cream, strawberries, lime zest and cracked peppercorns. Freeze cream cheese mixture in ice cream maker.
2. Transfer to an airtight container and put in freezer to harden, at least 2 hours. Let ice cream soften 5 minutes before serving.
Be sure to check out the magnificent creations by my fellow Daring Bakers by clicking on the links to their blogs at the Daring Bakers Blogroll site!
![]()
Yankees 2009 Off Season Moves – Part Two: POSITION PLAYERS
February 8, 2009 at 2:43 pm | In Baseball | 10 CommentsTags: Angel Berroa, Bobby Abreu., Jason Giambi, Kanekoa Texeira, Kevin Cash, Manny Ramirez, Mark Texeira, New York, Nick Swisher, NY Yankees, Written By Jason, Xavier Nady, Yankee offseason 2009, Yankees
Now, on to the position players. The departure of Abreu and Giambi left a couple of holes to fill and some pretty big numbers to make up. The two combined for 52 home runs, 196 RBI, and 24 stolen bases as well as each being on base over 37% of the time. The Yankees already had an in-house answer to the vacated right field position with Xavier Nady. The Yanks had aquired Nady midway through last season to play some outfield and provide right handed pop in the lineup. As for first base, there was no one within the system that the team felt comfortable playing there on an everyday basis. The general feeling was that with pitching being the main focus of the offseason, that the Yanks would have to be more creative with their approach to fixing the lineup. Their first answer came with an early offseason trade with the Chicago White Sox in which the Yankees parted with Wilson Betemit, Jeff Marquez, and Jhonny Nunez in order to aquire Nick Swisher and Kanekoa Texeira. Swisher is a switch hitter with power and the ability to play quality defense at the corner outfield positions and first base as well as a passable center field. I absolutely loved this trade. Swisher gave the team a viable first baseman with versatility and they lost only Marquez that was of particular value. Betemit had been fairly awful in his role as utility man for the Yanks and research suggests that Nunez and Texeira have fairly comparable potential. So, had the Yankees ended their fixes there, with Swisher and Nady replacing Giambi and Abreu, the lineup would be ok. It wouldn’t be over the top, but it would work. Not good enough.
Enter Mark Teixeira. Seemingly content with their acquisition of Nick Swisher to play first base, the Yankees were considered a peripheral player at best in the Mark Teixeira sweepstakes, until they swooped in at the eleventh hour and signed the switch hitting gold glover to an 8 year $180 million dollar contract just before Christmas. Teixeira was too perfect for the Yanks to pass up. Hit for power? Check! (33 HR last yr) Hit for average? Check! (.308 avg and a switch hitter to boot!) Drive in runs? Check! (121 RBI) Get on base? Check! (.410 OBP) and possibly the best defensive first baseman in baseball (certainly in the discussion). All that and he’s only 28 years old and doesn’t get hurt. He was by far the most complete position player on the market this offseason and plays a position at which the Yankees had a need; not to mention the fact the the Red Sox (chief rivals to the Yanks) had made him their offseason priority. How could anyone not love this move? With Teixeira signed, the question becomes what to do with Nick Swisher. Some suggest he play off the bench, but he’ll be paid over $5 million this year; an awful lot for a bench player. He also hit 24 home runs last year in what was an awful year for him. This to me suggests that his skill level is far too great to be wasted on the bench. Reports indicate that the Yanks are fielding trade offers for both Nady and Swisher. My hope is that they trade Nady and keep Swisher to play right field and here are my reasons why:
- Last season. It was a career year for Nady and an abysmal year for Swisher. In short, it was an abberation. Last year, Nady Posted 25 HR, 97 RBI, and an OBP of .357, while his averages over the previous three seasons are 17 HR, 60 RBI, and an OBP of .330 Last year Swisher posted 24 HR, 69 RBI, and an OBP of .332, while his previous three season averages are 26 HR, 82 RBI, and an OBP of .358
Swisher’s horrible year posted slighty better than Nady’s previous three season averages. I think It’s more likely Swisher bounces back than Nady continues at last years’ pace. - Defense. Nady is a slightly above average right or left fielder. Swisher is a very strong right fielder, a strong left fielder, a strong first baseman and a passable center fielder.
- Switch hitting. Nady is a right handed hitter that hits better against righties than lefties. Swisher hits from both sides of the plate, giving him an advantage against lefties and also allowing him to make better use of the short porch in left field at Yankee Stadium when facing righties.
- Contract. Nady is a free agent after the season and a Scott Boras client; meaning that if he has even a decent year, he will be expensive to resign. Swisher is under contract for at three years with an option for a fourth, all at affordable rates. If the Yanks were to keep Nady, they may have to sign two entirely new corner outfielders for 2010.
- Youth. Swisher is two years younger. Every little bit of leverage against father time helps.
Remember those numbers the Yanks lost with Giambi and Abreu leaving? If they keep Swisher in right field and he bounces back to his previous three year averages; he and Teixeira should combine for at least 59 HR, 203 RBI, and be on base over 38% of the time. If Brett Gardner plays center field rather than Melky Cabrera, then the Yanks should completely negate the loss of Abreu’s stolen bases and then some. This configuration should have the team putting up better numbers in every category as well as playing better defense than the past. Also, last season, Jorge Posada contributed only 3 HR, 18 Runs, and 22 RBI while his average contributions over the previous three seasons were 21 HR, 74 Runs, and 85 RBI. Similarly, Hideki Matsui contributed only 9 HR, 43 Runs, and 45 RBI while his previous three year averages were 19 HR, 80 Runs, and 83 RBI. If you take into account that Matsui was also hurt for the majority of the 2006 season, his healthy numbers should project closer to 23 HR, 100 Runs, and 105 RBI. Assuming that Posada and Matsui can play significantly more than last season, the offense should have much better numbers on the whole. Stabilize and improve an offense that struggled to put runs on the board? Mission accomplished!
In other position player moves, the Yanks also added Kevin Cash on a minor league deal to provide catching depth, and Angel Berroa on a minor league deal to compete with Cody Ransom for the back-up infielder position. Good stuff!
So, what’s left to do? Many people have talked about the possibility of the Yanks signing Manny Ramirez. Although I would have a very difficult time rooting for a player featuring Ramirez’ personality, I admit that the lure of what he could do for the Yankees offense is immense. Given the current construction of the team, however, this move simply will not happen. The Yankees have no place to play Ramirez and far too much money tied up in immovable personnel to make him fit. The team supposedly explored possible trades for Hideki Matsui that would have freed up the DH position as well as some funds, but no one is interested in picking up an aging hitter that’s coming off his second knee surgery and has 13 million owed to him for the season. The Yanks could probably find someone that would take on Johnny Damon’s contract, but that would leave the team without a true leadoff hitter. Perhaps adding Ramirez’ powerful bat would make up for losing Damon as a catalyst, but it doesn’t appear to be a risk the Yanks are interested in taking. So unless a team comes out of the woodwork with a new found interest in Matsui, Ramirez will continue to remain a “What if” topic for Yankees fans. Therefore, other than irading Nady, the only other move I would suggest is to sign reliever Juan Cruz. The guy is just hanging out there on the market because his type A free agent status will force a team that signs him to give up a draft pick. He’s a set up guy with nasty stuff that racks up the strikeouts and would be a nice addition to the Yankee bullpen. Due to the free agents they’ve already signed, he wouldn’t cost the Yanks an early round pick the way he would most other teams. There seems to be some confusion in recent reports as to what the quota of type A and B free agents that a team can sign is, but if the Yanks can indeed sign another, this would be a good one.
I hope everyone enjoyed this overview of the Yankees offseason moves.
Note by Lisa – I would prefer to hold onto Nady over Swisher, and uhh, I wouldn’t protest Manny in pinstripes, especially with this A-Rod mess. Alex could end up being a distraction to the Yankees a la Barry Bonds to the Giants!
The whole A-Rod-steroid mess coming soon…
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.




























